Skip Navigation

Early Music 2008 36(2):265-284; doi:10.1093/em/can046
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pinnock, A.
Right arrow Articles by Wood, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Early Music, Vol. XXXVI, No. 2 © The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

A mangled chime: the accidental death of the opera libretto in Civil War England

Andrew Pinnock and Bruce Wood

Correspondence: Andrew Pinnock is a two-faced academic personality: lecturer in arts management and cultural policy in the School of Humanities: Music, University of Southampton, and a much-published Purcellian, currently the Purcell Society’s Hon. Secretary. His research collaboration with Bruce Wood goes back nearly 20 years. A.J.Pinnock{at}soton.ac.uk

Correspondence: Bruce Wood is Professor of Music at Bangor University and Chairman of the Purcell Society. He has edited several volumes in the Purcell Society Edition and three of Musica Britannica, and has published extensively on English Restoration music. b.wood{at}bangor.ac.uk


   Abstract

Early 17th-century English lute song represents a perfect fusion of words and music, simultaneously conceived by poets and composers with a deep instinctive understanding of each other’s business. This is a critical commonplace with heavy implications for performers. To avoid distracting attention away from the words, musical settings were kept as simple as possible. To facilitate simple strophic setting the poets made sure that each stanza of a multi-stanza poem followed the same metrical scheme, and they naturally assumed that composers would follow it too. The Golden Age achievement relied on collective self-restraint (not too much self-expression or ‘interpretation’ therefore); and when Henry Lawes and other cavalier composers of masque songs and masque-inspired opera abandoned that restraint the Golden Age was over. Henry Purcell had to start again from scratch. Little of this turns out to be true. ‘A mangled chime’ looks again at the relationship between words and music in 17th-century England, suggesting a more complicated system of interplay between the two. Compositional technique was a mystery to most lyricists even at the height of the Golden Age, and as the century unfolded they found words matching the formal ambitions of contemporary theatre composers harder and harder to write. By 1680–90 (the decade of Venus and Adonis and Dido and Aeneas) the result was a peculiarly English approach to word-setting in which musical sound, though it echoed poetical sense, frequently obliterated poetic structure; a theory of English opera thoroughly confused in its aesthetic aims; and (in consequence) an uncoordinated response to opera seria when the Italian invasion began soon afterwards. Because Golden Age reserve inhibited frank negotiation between composers and poets it masked the composers’ textual needs in dramatic rather than lyrical situations and it led—via hugely resourceful but non-confrontational Lawes—to the overthrow of native English opera a century later.

Key Words: John Dowland • Henry Lawes • Thomas Campion • John Blow • Venus and Adonis • Henry Purcell • Dido and Aeneas • Georg Frideric Handel • Rinaldo • text-setting • early opera • masque


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.